Okay call me crazy but Jacob Black is what makes "Twilight" Series readable. Or is it the image of Taylor Lautner as Jacob Black which makes it readable? Well, it's one and the same, right?
Chances are that only Werewolves and its kind would agree with me on this. And Amrita and Rucha would never agree with me. They prefer Vampires, Edward Cullen to be precise.
This is how Amrita defends her choice - "Werewolves...yikes...hairy, smelly, ugly, with snouts, mo class, rumaging through jungles without clothes..typical Mallu choice...ROFL. Vampires on the other hand are beautiful, classy, our breed in some way, rich, have stories to share through generations, can bear kids, they are living for in search of eternal loveee, how romantic is that!"
This is how I TRIED and FAILED to defend my choice - ~drools over Taylor Lautner~ "Hmmm taylor Lautner..hot, really hot, absobloodylutely hot, rides bikes, knows to assemble bikes and cars (all the more better), cliff dives, adventurous, has a great sense of humour, rummage through the jungle without clothes and if all the Wearwolves are even a percentage of what Taylor Lautner looks like, then Jeez, May the Werewolves never find their clothes again. Amen":-p
I have n't read got around to read the entire book much, so I couldn't come up with something relevant to prove that Werewolves are better. Actually, Iam not overly fond of Werewolves either. And honestly speaking, I don't think I like vampire-werewolf-or-some-strange-half-animal-half-human love stories.
And call me crazy once again, but someone should lend Edward Cullen (and me too :D ) a sense of humour. Hurry, please!
I don't know how to end this post. So, Bbye. Night!
P.S. This blog entry could win the award for the lamest blog entry ever. Really.
1 comment:
Vampires for me are not Patterson, they mean Edward Cullen to me :-)
Post a Comment